I’m a Whovian, which means that I’m a member
of the Doctor Who fandom. Doctor Who, the smash BBC hit that was named the longest-running science fiction
television show by Guinness World Records, was revived in 2005 after over a
decade of hiatus. Throughout the classic show and modern revival, the Doctor
travels in his TARDIS spaceship through time and space with companions, saving
small cities as well as the entire universe from disaster. Many feminist
Whovians have analyzed the Doctor and his companions’ representations of
gender, race, and sexuality; in this series, I give some of my own
interpretations.
Amy Pond is the first companion to travel with the Doctor as
portrayed by Matt Smith. She is the only full-time companion in the modern
revival to join the Doctor in the TARDIS for more than two series, from Series
5 until midway through Series 7.
Personally, Amy is probably my least favorite companion. After
really liking her predecessors Rose, Martha, and Donna, Amy was a bit of a
letdown, particularly because she was on the show for over two seasons. While
watching, I felt that Amy had a lot of potential to be an interesting,
well-rounded, evolving character, but Doctor
Who head honcho Steven Moffat really squandered the opportunity.
I think that Amy can accurately be summarized through three tropes
of female characters: sexual, damsel, and mother.
Numerous feminist Whovians have pointed out that Amy is
sexualized in a way that the other companions are not. When the Doctor meets
Amy as an adult for the first time, she is dressed as a police officer. She’s
not actually a cop, though! No, she’s a kiss-o-gram playing an officer.
Although most of the Doctor’s companions have jobs that they don’t like or are
considered low status – Rose is a shop girl, Donna is a temp, Clara is a nanny
– Amy is the first whose profession is sexualized in such a way. Honestly,
using the word “profession” to describe her stint as a kiss-o-gram is
questionable; she is not shown to like the work she is doing, or as ever doing
it again. The next time we learn of her taking a job, she is working as a model
– another sexualized career choice.
Of course, there is nothing wrong or anti-feminist with being a
kiss-o-gram or model, but the way the show has Amy doing it makes me uncomfortable.
I don’t get the feeling that she’s owning her sexuality and being sexual for
her own sake; rather, she’s being sexualized, dressing and acting for the male Whovian’s
gaze. I think I get this impression because, in general, she is never really
her own person. She’s the Doctor’s companion, Rory’s wife, River Song’s
mother…never just Amy alone, in the way that Rose, Martha, and Donna were. The
audience just doesn’t know Amy’s personality well enough to be able to judge if
she’s sexualizing herself because she wants to.
Amy also frequently plays the damsel in distress. Certainly,
there are a number of episodes in which she does a lot for her own sake (and
the world’s), like in “The Girl Who Waited” and “The Curse of the Black Spot.” However,
in general, she tends to kind of sit around and wait for the Doctor (or even
Rory) to swoop in. I think this is best illustrated by the fact that she’s
kidnapped by Madame Kovarian and waits for the Doctor to save her. Admittedly,
she can’t really fight back while being held against her own will in an induced
sleep, but Moffat could’ve had her break herself free somehow. I mean, he’s
writing the plots. But noooo, she has to be saved by the Doctor, the Sleeping
Beauty awakened by the Prince’s kiss.
Although other companions come to take on a mothering role with
the Doctor, Amy quite literally becomes his mother-in-law. She is the only
companion to have a child (she’s also the only companion to be married while
traveling with the Doctor), and she comes to be defined by her biological role.
Her value is largely derived from mothering River, and River’s value is largely
derived from being the Doctor’s wife. It all boils down to their connection
with a Doctor, and not their own inherent worth.
According to a
recent study, episodes with Amy only pass the Bechdel test 53% of the time.
This is in stark comparison to the Doctor’s three previous full-time female
companions, whose episodes pass the Bechdel test 74%, 78%, and 100%,
respectively. I’m not surprised.
I’m not sure if I can say that Amy is a feminist character. Although
she has some good moments, she tends to fall into sexist media tropes and does
not do much to challenge those stereotypes. Amy is needlessly sexualized
throughout her time in the TARDIS, and not in a way that I believe is feminist.
She largely depends on the Doctor and Rory to save her, and is rarely given any
agency of her own. She adopts a mothering role, both literally and
metaphorically, with the Doctor. I really blame Moffat for letting the
opportunity for a really fierce, awesome, well-rounded female character just
slip through his fingers, and can only hope that he’ll break this pattern in
the upcoming Series 8.
No comments:
Post a Comment