For today’s young feminists, the
name Phyllis Schlafly may be totally unfamiliar; if anything, it triggers a
distant memory of a footnote in an AP US history textbook. Those activists who
lived and fought during the Second Wave are, however, all too familiar with the
uber-conservative activist.
Ever since the 1940s, Schlafly has
preached that women should be barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen. She has
said things like “By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don’t
think you can call it rape,” and has called Roe v. Wade “the worst
decision in the history of the US Supreme Court.” She recently endorsed the
candidacy of Todd Akin, of “the female body has ways to try to shut that whole
thing down” infamy. In the 1970s, when states were voting on the Equal Rights
Amendment (ERA), Schlafly waged the STOP ERA campaign. Although she believes
womankind as a whole should be homemakers, she apparently doesn’t apply this
rule to herself, considering she traveled around the country as part of STOP ERA.
Her efforts, and those of other opponents of women’s rights, were (unfortunately) successful; the ERA, which
would ensure that “equality of rights
under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on
account of sex,” was only ratified by 35 out of 38 states necessary.
(Although the ERA was not passed in
the 20th century, feminists have continued their efforts to
secure its ratification.)
Given the above description, I think it’s impossible to call Schlafly a
groundbreaker for women’s rights. For some reason, makers.com seems to
disagree.
According to its website, makers.com is a “dynamic
digital platform…showcasing hundreds of compelling stories from women of today
and tomorrow.” There is also an affiliated documentary titled MAKERS: Women Who
Make America that “will tell the story of the women’s movement through the
firsthand accounts of the leaders, opponents, and trailblazers who created a
new America
in the last half-century.” One
part of the website showcases “Groundbreakers,” whom the website defines as
“firsts in their fields, visionary role models or frontline activists who
sparked, and some who opposed, change for women.” To the amazement of
feminists, Phyllis Schlafly is included as a Groundbreaker along with real
groundbreakers like Gloria Steinem and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
My mentor, National Organization
for Women (NOW) cofounder Sonia Pressman Fuentes was astounded by
this gross misrepresentation. She asked Betsy West and Dyllan McGee, the
producers of makers.com and the filmmakers of the forthcoming documentary based
on it, to remove Schlafly from the website
and film. They refused, although they did twice change the definition of Groundbreakers
until they settled on the one quoted above. Although the newest definition of
Groundbreakers includes those who opposed women’s rights, it still makes no
sense. “Since when are those who oppose progress considered groundbreakers?”
Ms. Fuentes asks.
“She most definitely does not fit the current description of ‘Groundbreaker,’” wrote US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in an October 10, 2012, letter to Ms. Fuentes.
“She most definitely does not fit the current description of ‘Groundbreaker,’” wrote US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in an October 10, 2012, letter to Ms. Fuentes.
Additionally, although makers.com
claims to include women alive today who were instrumental in changing women’s
status during the last 50 years, the website and documentary do not include a
single one of the nine living NOW cofounders. “The absence of any founding member of NOW is a huge oversight and surely should be corrected,” Justice Ginsburg also wrote in her letter. When Ms. Fuentes complained about Schlafly’s inclusion and
the dearth of NOW members, Betsy West offered several times to
interview her in a clear effort to buy her off. Ms. Fuentes declined to be interviewed
until Schlafly is removed from the makers.com website and film, or, at the very
least, moved from the status of Groundbreaker to something more accurate like
“Opposition.”
To urge PBS and AOL (makers.com’s
sponsors) to remove Schlafly from makers.com or, at least, remove her from the
designation of Groundbreaker, Ms. Fuentes and I drafted an online petition.
We’ve gotten a lot of support in a short amount of time, and that means so much
to both of us. However, to get the attention of makers.com, PBS, and AOL, we need
to make this thing huge. Sign the petition here.
Send the link to your friends, family, neighbors, and any organizations with
which you are affiliated or that you think would be interested in this issue. Understanding the history of women’s rights is essential to ending gender inequality. Unless
we ensure herstory is preserved correctly in websites and documentaries like
makers.com, how can we expect to learn from the past and improve the future?
I'm really sad that PBS is involved! They were the only TV channel I watched as a kid and I thought they were better than this.
ReplyDelete